rogerfederer.com - Nadal defends his crown 
Navigation with Access Keys
- [Alt + 0] - Startseite
- [Alt + 1] - Navigation
- [Alt + 2] - Inhalt
- [Alt + 3] - Kontakt
- [Alt + 4] - Sitemap
- [Alt + 5] - Suche
Language menu
News

Nadal defends his crown
Roger was not able to defeat Rafael Nadal in the Monte Carlo Masters final, losing a tough fight 2-6 7-6 (7-2) 3-6 6-7 (5-7).
The Spanish second seed took the first set after racing to a 5-1 lead, but Roger found his form in the second. Nadal still broke him to love in the seventh game before his nerve wobbled, allowing the Swiss star to break back for 5-5 and then win the tiebreaker. But Nadal showed why he is the world's best on clay in the third set, then edged a tense fourth to seal victory.
Roger looked to have extended an epic final into a fifth set when he took a 3-0 lead in the second tiebreaker. But the 19-year-old Spaniard fought back as the shadows lengthened on court at the Monte Carlo Country Club. A forehand winner on his first match point finally sealed victory and his 14th career title after three hours and 49 minutes of thrilling tennis.
"It was a very unbelievable day for me," said Nadal. "It's special to begin the clay season like this.
Beating Roger in the final is even more special, it's great."
Roger, who had never progressed past the quarter-finals in Monaco before this year, admitted: "Rafael played a great match, it was tough to lose." Nadal had also inflicted the world number one's only other defeat of 2006, beating him in the final of the hardcourt Dubai Open on 4 March.
Roger also lost to Nadal in the semi-finals of last year's French Open, the only grand slam tournament he has yet to win. "I played a smarter match today than last year's Paris semi-final," Roger added. "I have moved closer to him on clay and that's very important."
Nadal now has a 4-1 record against the Swiss world number one, and has chalked up a remarkable 42 successive wins on clay. The left-hander is third on the all-time list behind Guillermo Vilas (53) and Bjorn Borg (46).

Sorry for remarking too late Judes identification Nadal to Nemesis (24.04.2006)
Thanks to site for making
I admit that Nadal is a excellent player, but he's not the perfect one, hes not the best unless there had never been a player named Roger F
I admit that Nadal is a excellent player,but he's not the perfect one,he's not the best unless there had never been a player named Roger Federe
I admit that Nadal is a excellent player,but he's not the perfect one,he's not the best unless there had never been a player named Roger Federe
You're absolutely right in saying that things might be different if Blake played Nadal on clay.
I don't think my comments were irrelevant, though, because the idea of Federer being more physical still stands.
I agree with all the others who say you are getting closer to Nadal.....you are and you will get there....just "vasbyt" as we say in South Africa....! Believe in yourself and just do it!
All best wishes for Rome
Shell
your the best...
BUT
do you have what it takes to beat the Spaniard who is only 19 and has a 4-1 lead on you. We have faith but do you?