• Members:
    347'638
    Users online:
    loading
 

News

 
RSS
 

Roger defeated in final

20.04.2014 | Tennis, Starseite 2

Roger was defeated by fellow Swiss Stanislas Wawrinka 6-4, 6-7(5), 2-6 in today's final in Monte Carlo.

 

Roger started well, taking the first set thanks to a break to 3-2. Stan gained momentum, breaking Roger in the second set, but our champ responded with a break himself. The tie-breaker was decided by a mere two points with Stan taking it 7-5. Roger fell two breaks behind to trail 0-4 in the decider and was finally defeated after two hours and 13 minutes of play.

 
Insert comment
Only registered users can insert comments. Please log in or create a new account.
 
Page 1 | 57
05/09/2014 | 08:25 PM
Really, Agassi is an absolute idiot. Five years separate Roger and Nadal. FIVE years of tennis is a lifetime. Arguably a generation. Add Roger's lost year to mono (a disease that ended careers of others),and his comeback, then his greatness is even more astounding.

And let's talk about consistency, which is necessary to be "the greatest". Nadal today, at his peak, is losing, very up/down. Compare this to Roger's long streak of complete dominance at number 1.

Roger is the GOAT.
05/09/2014 | 08:18 PM
I would like to comment on Andre Agassi's proclaiming that Nadal is the greatest ever because he beat Roger in Roger's prime. Agassi is an idiot who apparently doesn't know how to count. Roger peaked before Nadal was a factor, beat Nadal when it mattered into the mid 2000s. Even past his peak, Roger still beat Nadal.

During his greatest run, Roger dominated tennis, including Nadal.

Tell Agassi to shut up and spread the word.

The only GOAT is Roger Federer.
05/07/2014 | 04:28 PM
It was exciting final!!! But never mind, it will be better!!! GOO ROGER!!! GOO!!!
05/06/2014 | 08:00 AM
chutotoro*** (5 pages down)

YES

yuki
05/04/2014 | 11:41 PM
So no scandal then! Well for the time being!
05/04/2014 | 11:37 PM
Lol! Didn't notice that earlier.
Looks like the site is rife with false news. And notice the ads on top - that's their revenue model.
They post false news that eager readers will try to find out more about, "truthfully" mark their story "This story appears to be false", and make money off the ads.
05/04/2014 | 11:31 PM
I was disappointed that one of the sub links only led to statues covered up and not to you know who! lol
05/04/2014 | 11:29 PM
Lol, nevermind. It was rather comical.
05/04/2014 | 11:01 PM
(CJ and Shatir - Apologies for that junk link I sent you both!)
05/04/2014 | 10:48 PM
New thread has just appeared!
Page 1 | 57